Software & AppsOperating SystemLinux

LN -S vs MOUNT –BIND: Understanding the Differences

Ubuntu 3

In the world of Linux, there are numerous ways to create links and shortcuts to files and directories. Among the most commonly used methods are the ln -s and mount --bind commands. While they may seem similar on the surface, there are some key differences between them that can greatly impact their usage. In this article, we’ll delve into the specifics of these two commands, explaining what they do, how they work, and how they differ.

Quick Answer

The ln -s command is used to create symbolic links in Linux, which are files that point to another file or directory. Symbolic links can be renamed, deleted, and moved around freely, and they persist after a system reboot. On the other hand, the mount --bind command is used to create mount points, which are new names for existing directories or files. Mount points cannot be renamed or deleted and do not persist after a system reboot, unless manually added to the /etc/fstab file.

Symbolic Links with ln -s

The ln -s command is used to create symbolic links in Linux. A symbolic link, often referred to as a symlink or soft link, is a special kind of file that points to another file or directory.

ln -s /path/to/original /path/to/symlink

In this command, /path/to/original is the file or directory that you’re linking to, and /path/to/symlink is the name and location of the symbolic link you’re creating.

Symbolic links can be very useful for creating shortcuts, as they can be renamed, deleted, and moved around freely. They also persist after a system reboot, making them a convenient and flexible tool for managing files and directories.

However, symbolic links have their limitations. For instance, if you’re operating within a chroot environment and the target of your symbolic link is located outside of that environment, the link will be dead and unusable.

Bind Mounts with mount --bind

The mount --bind command, on the other hand, is used to create mount points. A mount point is essentially a new name for an existing directory or file.

mount --bind /path/to/original /path/to/mountpoint

In this command, /path/to/original is the directory or file you’re creating a mount point for, and /path/to/mountpoint is the location and name of the mount point.

Unlike symbolic links, mount points are not actual files and therefore cannot be renamed or deleted. They also do not persist after a system reboot, unless you manually add them to the /etc/fstab file.

Despite these differences, bind mounts have their own set of advantages. For instance, they remain accessible even in a chroot environment, and they can mask the original contents of a directory or file, making them inaccessible unless the original was bind mounted elsewhere.

Key Differences

While both ln -s and mount --bind can be used to create links to files and directories, there are some key differences in their behavior:

  1. Chroot Environment: As mentioned earlier, in a chroot environment, symbolic links that point to locations outside the environment will be dead. However, bind mounts will still be accessible.
  2. Program Recognition: Some programs can distinguish between symbolic links and actual directories or files. However, they cannot distinguish between a directory or file and a bind mount. This can lead to some unexpected behavior.
  3. Masking: You can use bind mounts to mask the original contents of a directory or file, making them inaccessible unless the original was bind mounted elsewhere. With symbolic links, you would need to move or delete the original to achieve a similar effect.
  4. Deletion: When using rm -r on a mount --bind, it has the same effect as running rm -r on the target, while with a symbolic link, it only removes the link itself.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ln -s and mount --bind are two powerful tools for creating links to files and directories in Linux. While they may seem similar on the surface, they each have their own unique behaviors and use cases. By understanding these differences, you can make more informed decisions about which tool to use in different scenarios.

What is the difference between `ln -s` and `mount –bind`?

ln -s creates a symbolic link, which is a special kind of file that points to another file or directory. On the other hand, mount --bind creates a mount point, which is essentially a new name for an existing directory or file.

Can symbolic links and bind mounts be renamed or deleted?

Symbolic links can be renamed, deleted, and moved around freely. However, bind mounts cannot be renamed or deleted.

Do symbolic links and bind mounts persist after a system reboot?

Symbolic links persist after a system reboot, while bind mounts do not, unless you manually add them to the /etc/fstab file.

Are symbolic links and bind mounts accessible in a `chroot` environment?

Symbolic links that point to locations outside of a chroot environment will be dead and unusable. However, bind mounts remain accessible in a chroot environment.

Can programs distinguish between symbolic links and bind mounts?

Some programs can distinguish between symbolic links and actual directories or files. However, they cannot distinguish between a directory or file and a bind mount.

How can bind mounts mask the original contents of a directory or file?

Bind mounts can mask the original contents of a directory or file, making them inaccessible unless the original was bind mounted elsewhere.

What happens when you delete a symbolic link or a bind mount?

When you delete a symbolic link, it only removes the link itself. However, when you delete a bind mount, it has the same effect as running the delete command on the target directory or file.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *